Key Takeaways:
- 1. The deployment of the USS Gerald Ford to support a mission against Venezuela reflects poor management of combat assets and overzealous military posturing.
- 2. Pursuing military action in Venezuela could have significant financial and manpower costs with minimal gains.
- 3. The Trump administration’s strategy lacks a coherent framework and contradicts its philosophy of reduced military engagement.
The deployment of the USS Gerald Ford to Venezuela highlights concerns over mismanagement of assets and overzealous military posturing. Pursuing military action in Venezuela could be costly with minimal gains. The Trump administration's strategy lacks coherence and contradicts its philosophy of reduced military engagement, risking alienating its base and contributing to international unrest. It is advocated to shift focus towards diplomatic solutions and regional partnerships to resolve tensions.
Insight: High-ranking military officials may recognize the shortcomings of the approach, but dissent is stifled by military hierarchy, hindering candid dialogue on military interventions.
This article was curated by memoment.jp from the feed source: SOFREP.
Read the original article here: https://sofrep.com/news/the-bolduc-brief-a-critical-examination-of-military-engagement-in-venezuela-the-case-against-current-strategies/
© All rights belong to the original publisher.
