Key Takeaways:
- 1. Scientists criticize Department of Energy’s climate report as lacking scientific integrity and attempting to undermine established climate science.
- 2. Trump administration’s EPA is reconsidering the 2009 endangerment finding that allows regulation of greenhouse gases, citing concerns based on the DOE’s report.
- 3. Concerns raised about the potential consequences of disregarding climate science on public safety and prosperity.
Scientists, including Kim Cobb from Brown University, criticize the DOE's climate report for undermining established climate science. The Trump administration's EPA is reconsidering greenhouse gas regulations based on this report, raising concerns about the impact on climate science integrity and public safety. While some, like Roger Pielke Jr., believe the legal arguments may influence decisions, Cobb warns of the grave costs of turning away from science in addressing climate change impacts.
Insight: The article highlights the importance of upholding climate science integrity in policymaking and addressing the impacts of climate change on public safety and prosperity.
This article was curated by memoment.jp from the feed source: Ars Technica.
Read the original article here: https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/09/mockery-of-science-climate-scientists-tear-into-new-us-climate-report/
© All rights belong to the original publisher.
