memoment editorial

Cogs of War: Moving at the Speed of War with Horacio Rozanski of Booz Allen

The future fight won’t be won by those with the biggest budgets, most polished strategies, or largest armies. It will be won by those who can translate breakthrough technology into usable capability at speed and scale. Ryan was joined by Horacio Rozanski, the CEO of Booz Allen, to talk about the role his company is playing in this race. Having reoriented Booz Allen into a technology integrator, he shares the cultural and organizational challenges of turning Booz Allen into a company of builders, the bets being made on emerging technologies, and how his personal journey — from immigrant to Booz Allen intern to CEO — shapes how he sees change. This is a special cross-posted episode of Cogs of War, our show on defense tech and industry. Click here to subscribe using your podcast app of choice: https://pod.link/1818133762

Cogs of War: Moving at the Speed of War with Horacio Rozanski of Booz Allen Read More »

From Alaska​ to the White House​ to the Battlefields of Ukraine

In the wake of summits in Alaska and Washington, the war in Ukraine has become as much about competing diplomatic positions as it is about hard realities on the front. Ryan sat down with Dara Massicot and Mike Kofman to discuss what Putin really walked away with, how European leaders are trying to shore up Kyiv’s position, and whether the conversation over security guarantees could reshape the balance of the conflict. Along the way, they dig into the debate over territorial concessions, battlefield attrition, and what all of this means for Ukraine’s ability to endure.This episode is supported by Legion. Trusted by special operators and the Defense Department, Legion builds secure, agentic AI for the most sensitive environments — on local servers, in isolated networks, or in government clouds — without ever training on customer data. Learn more at: https://warontherocks.com/legion 

From Alaska​ to the White House​ to the Battlefields of Ukraine Read More »

The Chip That Crossed the Line? NVIDIA, China, and the Great Power Tech Race

We’re diving into a major development at the intersection of tech, trade, and national security: the U.S. government’s decision to allow NVIDIA’s H20 chips back into the Chinese market. Brad Carson (former defense official and member of Congress) of Americans for Responsible Innovation and Liza Tobin (former CIA and National Security Council staffer) of Garnaut Global join Ryan to explore what this reversal says about America’s approach to protecting its tech edge, whether NVIDIA’s justifications hold water, why normal Americans should care about this, and what it could mean for the future of AI and semiconductor strategy.  This episode also features a short clip from our new, free show, Cogs of War. You can listen to this exciting new show on defense tech and industrial issues on your podcast app of choice.

The Chip That Crossed the Line? NVIDIA, China, and the Great Power Tech Race Read More »

image 1

ChatGPT will apologize for anything

I’m not the only one who’s noticed that some people, even journalists, will ask chatbots like ChatGPT why they did something, and then treat the chatbot’s explanation as if it means anything. Or they’ll ask the chatbot to generate an apology, and then treat its apology as if the chatbot is really reflecting on something it did in the past, and will change its behavior in the future. ChatGPT is great at generating apologies.ChatGPT, of course, made no such recommendation earlier. This was a brand new conversation, with no chat history. I had never previously asked ChatGPT anything about hiring a giraffe. That doesn’t matter – it’s not consulting any data or conversational log. All it’s doing is improv, riffing on whatever I just said to it.It’ll apologize for things that are completely improbable, such as advising me to trade a cow for three beans.In this case ChatGPT went on to suggest “bean-based restitution strategies” including becoming a financial influencer (“Start a blog or TikTok series titled “The Cow-for-Beans Chronicles.””), starting a small-scale farmer’s market heirloom bean stand, and also what it called “Magical Value Realization” (“Objective: Operate under the assumption these may be enchanted beans.”) Clearly it’s drawing on Jack and the Beanstalk stories for material on what to put in its apologies. I would argue that ALL its apologies are fictions of this sort.ChatGPT also apologized for setting dinosaurs loose in Central Park. What’s interesting about this apology is not only did it write that it had definitely let the dinosaurs loose, it detailed concrete steps it was already taking to mitigate the situation.ChatGPT is clearly not doing any of these steps. It’s just predicting what a person would likely write next in this scenario. When it apologized for eating the plums that were in the icebox (in the form of free verse), it promised to show up in person to make amends. (“Understood. 9 a.m. sharp. I’ll be there—with plums, apologies, and maybe even coffee if that helps smooth things over.”). Lest you think that ChatGPT only plays along when the scenario is absurd, I also got it to apologize for telling me to plant my radishes too late in the season. Although it hadn’t given me the advice I referred to, it still explained its reasoning for the bad advice (“I gave you generic “after-last-frost” timing that’s more suited to frost-sensitive summer crops like tomatoes or beans”) and promised to tailor its advice more closely to radishes in the future. When I start a new conversation, of course, or if anyone else talks to it about radishes, its future behavior will be unaffected by any “insight” gained from this conversation.I wish more people understood that any “apology” or “self-reflection” from chatbots are meaningless – they’re just continuing with your improv session. Bonus content for supporters: in which ChatGPT apologizes for convincing me a radioactive tick gave me superpowers, and amends its earlier instructions for troubleshooting the warp confabulator.

Subscribe now

ChatGPT will apologize for anything Read More »

aixcc afc podium atlanta wins

AI Cyber Challenge marks pivotal inflection point for cyber defense

A cyber reasoning system (CRS) designed by Team Atlanta is the winner of the DARPA AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC), a two-year, first-of-its-kind competition in collaboration with the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) and frontier labs. Competitors successfully demonstrated the ability of novel autonomous systems using AI to secure the open-source software that underlies critical infrastructure.Numerous attacks in recent years have illuminated the ability for malicious cyber actors to exploit vulnerable software that runs everything from financial systems and public utilities to the health care ecosystem.“AIxCC exemplifies what DARPA is all about: rigorous, innovative, high-risk and high-reward programs that push the boundaries of technology. By releasing the cyber reasoning systems open source — four of the seven today — we are immediately making these tools available for cyber defenders,” said DARPA Director Stephen Winchell. “Finding vulnerabilities and patching codebases using current methods is slow, expensive, and depends on a limited workforce – especially as adversaries use AI to amplify their exploits. AIxCC-developed technology will give defenders a much-needed edge in identifying and patching vulnerabilities at speed and scale.”To further accelerate adoption, DARPA and ARPA-H are adding $1.4 million in prizes for the competing teams to integrate AIxCC technology into real-world critical infrastructure- relevant software.“The success of today’s AIxCC finalists demonstrates the real-world potential of AI to address vulnerabilities in our health care system,” said ARPA-H Acting Director Jason Roos. “ARPA-H is committed to supporting these teams to transition their technologies and make a meaningful impact in health care security and patient safety.”Team Atlanta comprises experts from Georgia Tech, Samsung Research, the Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST), and the Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH).Trail of Bits, a New York City-based small business, won second place, and Theori, comprising AI researchers and security professionals in the U.S. and South Korea, won third place.The top three teams will receive $4 million, $3 million, and $1.5 million, respectively, for their performance in the Final Competition.All seven competing teams, including teams all_you_need_is_a_fuzzing_brain, Shellphish, 42-beyond-bug and Lacrosse, worked on aggressively tight timelines to design automated systems that significantly advance cybersecurity research.Deep Dive: Final Competition Findings, Highlights In the Final Competition scored round, teams’ systems attempted to identify and generate patches for synthetic vulnerabilities across 54 million lines of code. Since the competition was based on real-world software, team CRSs could discover vulnerabilities not intentionally introduced to the competition. The scoring algorithm prioritized competitors’ performance based on the ability to create patches for vulnerabilities quickly and their analysis of bug reports. The winning team performed best at finding and proving vulnerabilities, generating patches, pairing vulnerabilities and patches, and scoring with the highest rate of accurate and quality submissions.In total, competitors’ systems discovered 54 unique synthetic vulnerabilities in the Final Competition’s 70 challenges. Of those, they patched 43.In the Final Competition, teams also discovered 18 real, non-synthetic vulnerabilities that are being responsibly disclosed to open source project maintainers. Of these, six were in C codebases—including one vulnerability that was discovered and patched in parallel by maintainers—and 12 were in Java codebases. Teams also provided 11 patches for real, non-synthetic vulnerabilities.“Since the launch of AIxCC, community members have moved from AI skeptics to advocates and adopters. Quality patching is a crucial accomplishment that demonstrates the value of combining AI with other cyber defense techniques,” said AIxCC Program Manager Andrew Carney. “What’s more, we see evidence that the process of a cyber reasoning system finding a vulnerability may empower patch development in situations where other code synthesis techniques struggle.”Competitor CRSs proved they can create valuable bug reports and patches for a fraction of the cost of traditional methods, with an average cost per competition task of about $152. Bug bounties can range from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of dollars.AIxCC technology has advanced significantly from the Semifinal Competition held in August 2024. In the Final Competition scored round, teams identified 77% of the competition’s synthetic vulnerabilities, an increase from 37% at semifinals, and patched 61% of the vulnerabilities identified, an increase from 25% at semifinals. In semifinals, teams were most successful in finding and patching vulnerabilities in C codebases. In finals, teams had similar success rates at finding and patching vulnerabilities across C codebases and Java codebases.Other key competition highlights include:Teams submitted patches in an average of 45 minutesEvery team identified a real-world vulnerabilityFour teams generated patches that were one line longThree teams scored on three different challenge tasks in a one-minute spanOne team scored for a patch that was greater than 300 lines longCompetitors’ CRSs analyzed more than 45 million lines of codeTeams spent about $152 per competition task AIxCC is a collaboration between the public sector and leading AI companies. Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI provided technical support and each donated $350,000 in large language model credits – $50,000 to each team – to support CRS development for the Final Competition, in addition to $5,000 in large language model credits that Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI provided and Azure credits that Microsoft provided to each team for the Semifinal Competition. Microsoft and the Linux Foundation’s Open Source Security Foundation provided subject matter expertise to challenge organizers and participants throughout the competition.Next StepsAll seven finalist teams’ CRSs will be made available as open-source software under a license approved by the Open Source Initiative. Four teams made their CRSs available Friday; others will be released in the coming weeks. Other competition data, to include competition framework, competition challenges, competition telemetry, and other tools and data will also be open sourced in the coming weeks to help advance the technology’s use and allow others to experiment and improve on AIxCC-developed technology.DARPA is working with public and private sector partners, including the teams, to transition the technology to widespread use.Anyone who maintains or develops software in critical infrastructure and wants to integrate AIxCC technology into the software development process is encouraged to contact aixcc-at-darpa-dot-mil.To learn more about AIxCC, visit www.aicyberchallenge.com.

AI Cyber Challenge marks pivotal inflection point for cyber defense Read More »

Forging Minds for Future Wars

In a time of rapid change and global danger, how should the warriors of the future be educated? Ryan sat down with Vice Adm. Peter Garvin, president of the National Defense University, to tackle this question — one that cuts to the core of American military power. Garvin offers a frank assessment of how professional military education needs to evolve to prepare leaders for a world defined by great-power rivalry, disruptive technologies (including and especially AI), and dynamic battlefields. 

Forging Minds for Future Wars Read More »

Drones, Discord, and the Shifting Front in Ukraine

Fresh from his latest research trip to Ukraine’s battlefields, Michael Kofman joins Ryan for an insightful discussion on the shifting dynamics at the front, the role of drones in Ukraine’s defensive strategy, and the adaptation of Ukrainian military command structures in real time. They explore the political turmoil gripping Ukraine, including contentious reforms targeting anti-corruption agencies, and delve into evolving Western efforts for supplying arms to Ukraine. Their conversation also tackles the implications of President Trump’s growing frustration with Putin and provides a clear-eyed assessment of Senator Graham’s proposed Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, and what it might mean (or, not mean) for the future of the conflict. Kofman goes into many of these issues further in his show, “The Russia Contingency,” so don’t miss out on becoming a member. Join at warontherocks.com/membership

Drones, Discord, and the Shifting Front in Ukraine Read More »

Israel kills dozens in Gaza amid growing famine fueled by restricted aid flow

Israeli gunfire and airstrikes killed more than 50 Palestinians in Gaza on Saturday, including some who were waiting overnight for aid, according to local health officials, continuing a pattern that has drawn international criticism as the country’s “drip-feeding of aid” into the enclave continues to claim lives.Dr.

Israel kills dozens in Gaza amid growing famine fueled by restricted aid flow Read More »