memoment editorial

1 teens hack school cell phone bans with creative workarounds

Teens hack school cell phone bans with creative workarounds

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Across the country, schools are cracking down on cell phone use. At least 18 states have rolled out bell-to-bell bans, with New York calling phones “distraction devices.” Teachers are praising the shift, saying classes feel more focused. But teens? They’re not giving up so easily.Students are sidestepping bans in the most millennial-inspired way possible, turning Google Docs into digital chat rooms. With laptops open, it looks like they’re working on assignments. In reality, they’re typing messages back and forth in real time, just like an old-school AOL chat room.SCHOOLS’ SAFETY TOOLS ARE SPYING ON KIDS — EVEN AT HOMESign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CyberGuy.com/Newsletter   Students secretly turn Google Docs into real-time chatrooms. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)A creative workaround for school cell phone bansParents and teachers admit the workaround is clever. One teacher said she respects her students’ determination to stay connected and even acknowledged that the phone ban has improved behavior and focus in class. Still, she worries that turning Google Docs into chat rooms could open the door to bullying or cheating. Parents are also weighing in. One parent told CyberGuy that some kids in their district are buying MacBooks just so they can text each other through iMessage. Others, the parent added, are leaning on email threads or even old-school Post-It notes to keep the conversation alive. Teens share their classroom hacks on TikTok with pride. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)Social media reactionOn TikTok, students proudly show off their “secret” Docs conversations. Captions range from playful, “Your cell phone rule was never going to stop me,” to defiant: “Can’t ever silence us, queens.” The creativity is earning laughs from older generations who remember the days before smartphones. But the trend is also stirring debate. Some parents see it as a harmless way for kids to adapt, while others worry it undermines the entire point of the ban. Educators are split too, amused by the ingenuity, yet frustrated that students are still finding ways to drift off task during lessons. The viral clips prove one thing for sure: when it comes to tech, today’s teens will always find a workaround. Some kids buy MacBooks to keep texting through iMessage. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)Parent tips for navigating school cell phone bansIf your child’s school has adopted a phone ban, there are a few ways you can help them adjust while keeping communication open and safe:Talk about the rules at home: Explain why schools are putting these bans in place and set expectations for how your child should behave with laptops and other devices.Offer safe communication plans: Work with your child and the school to establish how you’ll contact each other in case of an emergency. Some districts allow phones in lockers or require them to stay powered off in backpacks.Encourage balance: Remind your child that downtime from screens can actually help them focus better in class and relax during the school day.Monitor alternatives: Keep an eye on how your child uses tools like Google Docs, email or messaging apps. What starts as chatting with friends can sometimes veer into bullying or cheating.Be open to feedback: Ask your child how the ban is affecting their school day. Their perspective can help you understand where the real challenges and benefits are showing up.TEENS AND PHONE USE WHILE DRIVING: WHY THIS DEADLY HABIT PERSISTSWhat this means for youIf you’re a parent, this shows just how inventive kids can be when rules are put in place. Cell phone bans may cut down on scrolling, but students are quickly shifting to other tools. They’re chatting through shared Google Docs, buying MacBooks so they can iMessage during class, swapping notes over email, and even sticking to old-school Post-Its to stay in touch. While some of these workarounds seem harmless, they also carry risks, from distractions that take focus away from learning to new opportunities for bullying or even cheating. For teachers, it’s a reminder that managing distractions in the classroom goes beyond phone policies. Laptops, messaging apps, and even simple sticky notes can become back doors for the same behaviors schools are trying to limit. Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: CyberGuy.com/QuizCLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPKurt’s key takeawaysPhone bans are reshaping the school day, and educators are already seeing benefits. Yet students are proving they’ll always find ways to connect, whether through phones, laptops or even retro workarounds that echo the early internet era.What do you think? Are these bans helping kids learn better, or are they simply pushing students to get sneakier with tech? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com/ContactSign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CyberGuy.com/NewsletterCopyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

Teens hack school cell phone bans with creative workarounds Read More »

deputy using draft one

Arizona sheriff’s office utilizing new AI program to assist with writing case reports

Key Takeaways: 1. Pima County Sheriff’s Department in Arizona is testing AI program Draft One from Axon for incident report writing. 2. AI tools like Draft One save time for law enforcement agencies in handling multiple incidents. 3. While AI offers opportunities for efficiency, concerns remain about accuracy and potential flaws in the data used.

Arizona sheriff’s office utilizing new AI program to assist with writing case reports Read More »

vegas ghost 2

Vegas Ghost Hunt, Alien DNA, Area 51 Crash, Shapeshifting Snake and More Mysterious News Briefly

A roundup of mysterious, paranormal and strange news stories from the past week.
The most unusual story to come out of Area 51 in years concerns a mysterious drone which crashed near Area 51 two weeks ago and caused authorities to close the airspace above and around the crash, even though there was no indication it had crossed over into Area 51’s restricted airspace (known as ‘The Box’); to add more strangeness to the mystery, the Air Force has now publicly disclosed that it and the FBI are investigating some unusual tampering at the crash site afterward; an official statement said in part: “On September 23, 2025, an aircraft assigned to the 432nd Wing was involved in an incident with no fatalities or injuries. The site was secured and guarded until recovery and cleanup operations were completed on September 27th. During a follow-on site survey on October 3rd, investigators discovered signs of tampering at the mishap location, including the presence of an inert training bomb body and an aircraft panel of unknown origin that were placed on the site post-incident. The matter is under investigation by the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) and the FBI. No further details are available at this time.” MQ-9 Reaper drones are housed by the 432nd Wing at the nearby Creech Air Force Base, but experts say it is highly unusual that the Air Force and FBI would be involved in the recovery of one. Could the announcement and unusual activity be a cover-up for what really happened?
The historic El Cortez Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas is one of the city’s oldest operating casinos (it opened in 1941) and paranormal investigators say it has plenty of activity, including mysterious knocks and cold spots, which one lucky person will get to experience themselves in the casino’s new Weekend Ghost Hunt contest; the winning applicant will receive a free flight to Las Vegas, a fee weekend stay at El Cortez, access to allegedly haunted areas, the use of ghost-hunting equipment, including specialized flashlights and thermal sensors; all activity the winner witnesses must be photographed and documented in order to receive a $5,000 prize; applications are open until Halloween, October 31st, 2025, at 12 pm EST. It’s a safe bet that there will be activity, provided the winner promises to split the prize with the ghosts.

They’ll never find me here – I blend right in.

The European Space Agency quelched conspiracy theories by announcing that it had turned the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) and Mars Express spacecraft towards the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS as it passed close to Mars and ExoMars TGO captured a series of images showing what looks like a “slightly fuzzy white dot moving downwards near the center of the image” – the dot is the comet’s center which consists of an icy-rocky nucleus and its surrounding coma; the coma, measuring a few thousand kilometers across, is “clearly visible” as it is heated by the Sun, releasing the gas and dust which surround the nucleus; while the full size of 3I/ATLAS could not be measured, this should put to rest the conjectures, led by Harvard professor Avi Loeb, that the space object is an interstellar spacecraft and not a comet – Loeb is now saying it could be a Trojan horse spaceship disguised as a comet. It’s so human and a sign of our times that so many people are disappointed that 3I/ATLAS is “just an interstellar comet”.
Few properties for sale in the U.S. have ‘conjured’ up as much controversy as the so-called Conjuring House – the Rhode Island home where the Perron family claimed to have been haunted for nearly a decade by various spirits, a state confirmed by paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren, whose alleged experiences inspired the Conjuring movies; the house was supposed to be sold at an auction on Halloween of this year, but a plea from Andrea Perron, daughter of the family who lived there, to preserve “the farm” as a paranormal investigation site reached Jason Hawes of the paranormal TV program ‘Ghost Hunters’; Hawes was raising money to buy the Conjuring House when it was suddenly announced by JJ Manning Auctioneers that the property in Burrillville had been sold to an unnamed buyer and the Halloween auction was called off. Has anyone checked to see if Annabelle is smiling and rubbing her little hands together?
A number of media outlets are posting headlines declaring that “alien DNA” has been found inside humans, where it was allegedly inserted by extraterrestrials; these stories are based on a non-peer-reviewed study by. Dr. Max Rempel, the founder and CEO of the DNA Resonance Research Foundation; Rempel analyzed 581 complete families from the 1,000 Genomes Project and claims he discovered ‘large sequences’ of DNA in 11 families that didn’t appear to correspond to either parent – the subjects were born before 1990 so he could rule out human gene-editing technologies like CRISPR which wasn’t used before 2013; Rempel also analyzed 23andMe results from people who claimed to be alien abductees and alleges that some families showed evidence of non-parental markers; if the study is confirmed, Rempel says “it could be possible to detect which humans carry alien DNA – essentially identifying hybrids” but he admits that there is “no conclusive evidence yet” and he needs “need better datasets which are available only on approval” to someday “consider how much alien hybridization is healthy for the planet and which alien races we might give priority”. I’, not saying it’s alien DNA – in fact, despite the headlines, no one should be … yet.
The latest on-site Loch Ness Monster report comes from the loch’s shore in Fort Augustus where tourists Erica and Mariusz Kawka of Malta were walking on a recent afternoon when they spotted and recorded a dark shape in the water that neither they nor other witnesses on the shore could identify; this would only be the fourth on-site sighting of Nessie in 2025, which is one more than 2024 but less than the 10 in 2023 and in other double-digit years. Ironically, sightings are no longer “logged” in the registry but are instead listed or registered.
The mystery of how the inhabitants of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) were able to move those massive stone statues and heads the island is famous for may have finally been solved by a new study which culminated with just 18 people needing only 40 minutes to move a 4.35-ton replica of one of them 300 feet with ropes as their only tool; the new study is published in the Journal of Archaeological Science and details how co-author Carl Lipo of Binghamton University led a team from that university and others to first develop created high-resolution 3D models of the statues to help identify distinctive design features such as D-shaped bases and a forward lean that would make them easier to move in a rocking, zig-zagging motion, which has been a popular theory of how it was actually done; according to Lipo, “The physics makes sense”; the team found that as the statues get bigger, “it still works”; he notes that the roads of Rapa Nui measure 4.5 meters (14.7 feet) wide with a concave cross-section, making them ideal for stabilizing the statues as they were moved”; the statues were then key to the road system on Rapa Nui and vice versa, demonstrating that “the Rapa Nui people were incredibly smart. They figured this out,” said Lipo. “They’re doing it the way that’s consistent with the resources they have. So it really gives honor to those people, saying, look at what they were able to achieve, and we have a lot to learn from them in these principles”. Learning from the past – what a concept!

They moved this with nothing but ropes? Sounds like a non-union job.

On a day known as Public Grievance Day (Samadhan Diwas) in Uttar Pradesh’s Sitapur district, a man complained to police officials that his wife turns into a snake at night, bites him, chases him and otherwise frightens him to the point he can no longer sleep; he claims she’s tried to kill him several times but he has caught her in time to prevent his murder; while the comments on social media run the gamut from support to ridicule, the District Magistrate took it seriously and ordered an investigation by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and the police; the wife claims the husband is harassing her for dowry and wants to get rid of her to marry someone else; while Indian folklore has many shapeshifters, medical experts say it could be a delusional disorder affecting one or both of them. With stories like this, India is becoming the Florida of countries.
Disclosure of secret UFO files was once restricted to presidential campaigns as a topic of discussion and a promise prefaced by “And if I’m elected, I will open …”; however, it has moved to congressional races as Representative Lauren Boebert, running for reelection in Colorado, promised to push the administration to do it, saying: “For decades, our government has shrouded the truth about UFOs in a veil of secrecy. Strange crafts have been spotted soaring through our skies, defying the laws of physics, and yet the bureaucrats in Washington act like we’re too NAIVE to handle the facts. They tell us we’re crazy like we can’t see these things flying through the air with our own eyes. I SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! The American people aren’t children to be spoon-fed half-truths or dismissed with vague excuses. We deserve to know what’s really going on up there.”; the email includes a link to a site about extraterrestrials and one to make donations; Boebert questioned UFO experts during a congressional hearing in 2024 and has participated in many Congressional hearings on UFOs. Is Boebert serious, or is this a smokescreen to hide a cover-up to cloak a distraction?
If it’s true that there is strength in numbers, then the number of Loch Ness Monster hunters has strengthened itself by doubling its members, as has the number of Bigfoot and Yeti hunters, with the formation of the new World Federation of Legendary Monsters; it is headquartered at the Loch Ness Centre in Inverness on the shore of the loch, where Nagina Ishaq, of the center described its mission: “For decades, Loch Ness has inspired scientists, storytellers, and sceptics alike. Now we are looking beyond the Highlands to build a global network of expertise as we look for new ways to uncover the biggest mysteries. We want to bring together the leading voices in folklore and science to share their theories, challenge assumptions and celebrate these legends in new ways”. If one of the famous cryptids is found, who gets to display the trophy?  
On a recent podcast, author and geologist Gregg Braden claimed an ancient human civilization lived on the Moon and Mars 50,000 years ago, but these humans “from us, from a time in our past” but these space colonists “destroyed one another through war, and that we’re repeating that cycle”; Braden claims the U.S. has had the only evidence of this civilization for some time, but China’s upcoming robotic Chang’e 7 mission and India’s Chandrayaan-4 mission, both to the Moon, will be looking for them so that both nations can “make the bombshell revelation” of their discovery to the public; many of Braden’s claims are based on grainy photographs from NASA’s Clementine mission to the Moon which show angled structures he claims were built by an ancient civilization, but most experts believe they were formed by erosion.

Let future generations take note – this is not what we signed up for.

Actress Kristen Wiig Reveals admitted on a recent podcast with fellow actress and Saturday Night Live alum Amy Poehler that, although she has never seen one, she believes in ghosts strongly enough that after she bought a 100-year-old, $5 million home Pasadena, California, she contacted a “professional ghost buster” who works remotely; the ghost buster must have done something because Wiig noted that ” I swear to God, my house felt different [after]”; Wiig also told Poehler that she “believe[s] in astral projection” because her great aunt “visited me in a dream after she died” when Wiig was 14. That podcast should have been called, “Not Live From New York”.
On the celebrity cryptid front, movie and theater actress Anna Kendrick revealed that, on a recent trip to Scotland, she went to Loch Ness, “and I saw her, I saw her”; while not mentioning Nessie by name, Kendrick said, “There was a thing and it came out of the water and it looked right at me. It might have actually just been one suspicious ripple. But I’m telling you there was something. I felt it”; Kendrick didn’t whip her phone out fast enough to capture a selfie with the cryptid. Of course, she didn’t – what Hollywood actress wants to be in a blurred photo?
A short video making the rounds on both social and mainstream media in Colombia shows what looks like a strange humanoid creature ambling in a crouched position across a road while well-lit by headlights; the social media post described the scene: “Travelers traveling in the middle of the night along the Balsillas-Neiva highway encountered a strange creature with human features that walked in an odd manner. One of the vehicle’s occupants managed to record the strange event with his cell phone”; commenters were skeptical, with some saying it was a boy play-acting, but as is the norm in Central and South America, believers said it was a shapeshifting nahual moving into or out of an animal form; no other information was supplied by the witness. If a shapeshifter gets stuck halfway between shapes, do we have the makings of a new horror movie?
The latest survey of places when one is most and least likely to see a UFO used sightings reports from the National UFO Reporting Center and digital media coverage to determine that the best place in the U.S. to see a UFO is in Washington state, where one in 1021 residents has reported seeing one – that moves Washington up from the #2 spot in a previous survey; #2 is nearby Oregon (1 for every 1,105 resident), followed by Florida, Delaware and New York; at the bottom, people are least likely to see a UFO in Louisiana (one in 3583 reported seeing one), followed by Mississippi, Alabama and New Jersey; in Canada, Alberta is #1 with 1 sighting per 568 people, followed by Ontario, British Columbia and Manitoba; at the bottom are the sparsely populated Newfoundland and Labrador, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia. Is Louisiana a low spot because of swamp gas blocking the view or people having too much good food to waste time looking for UFOs?
A sickly black cat adopted from a shelter is showing his gratitude to his rescuer by ‘reading’ her tarot cards with what she calls ‘eerie’ accuracy; Emily Cook says Cole began pawing at her tarot cards instead of chewing them or tearing them up like most cats would, saying “He just started ‘shuffling’ like a litter box toss and picked one with his little cat teeth and laid it on the carpet. I reinforced this with treats. I was like, ‘Holy sh*t, he’s not just doing it, he’s accurate!’”; seeing an opportunity, Cook has put Cole and his feline forecasts on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube and claims he has a waiting list of people waiting for a reading. Is Cole still working for treats or is he accepting PayCat?

Vegas Ghost Hunt, Alien DNA, Area 51 Crash, Shapeshifting Snake and More Mysterious News Briefly Read More »

ai

You’ll never trust video again once you see what Sora 2 can do

Key Takeaways: 1. Cyber expert Kurt Knutsson shares tips to avoid AI phishing scams. 2. OpenAI’s Sora 2 app generates AI videos that are realistic but can be abused. 3. Concerns raised about fake videos of dead celebrities and potential misuse for stalking and impersonation. Cyber expert Kurt Knutsson warns about AI phishing scams and

You’ll never trust video again once you see what Sora 2 can do Read More »

1 why wi fi calling may be killing your iphone battery life

Why Wi-Fi calling may be killing your phone’s battery life

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
When you live in an area with limited or no cell service, Wi-Fi calling can be a lifesaver. It keeps you connected for calls and texts when your phone would otherwise be useless. However, some iPhone users have noticed that this feature appears to drain their battery more quickly than usual. Laura B wrote to us asking:”Living in a rural area with no cell service, naturally, my iPhone is used with Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi calling only. It seems to me it uses more battery this way than when connected to cellular data. Is this possible?”Laura’s question is a common one, and the short answer is yes, Wi-Fi calling can sometimes use more battery than a strong cellular connection. The reasons haven’t changed much in iOS 26, but Apple has added a few tools that make it easier to understand and manage battery use. And if you’re on Android, don’t worry; we’ll cover the steps for your phone too, further down.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.10 IOS 26 TRICKS THAT HELP YOU GET MORE OUT OF YOUR IPHONE Wi-Fi calling keeps you connected but can drain your iPhone battery faster. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)Why Wi-Fi calling can use more powerEven though Wi-Fi calling is designed to keep you connected, there are a few behind-the-scenes reasons it may drain your iPhone battery faster than expected.1) Your phone still looks for a cellular signalEven when you don’t have service, your iPhone may periodically scan for towers. That search drains energy unless you take steps to stop it.2) Wi-Fi antenna + call processes stay activeWi-Fi calling requires your Wi-Fi radio to remain on constantly while also running extra background processes to stabilize calls. That workload can use more energy than simply maintaining a strong LTE signal.3) Weak or unstable Wi-Fi makes things worseIf your Wi-Fi signal drops or fluctuates, your iPhone works harder to maintain the connection. That extra effort can warm the phone and eat into your battery.WHY IPHONE USERS ARE THE NEW PRIME SCAM TARGETS Simple tweaks help you enjoy Wi-Fi calling without killing your charge. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)How to make Wi-Fi calling more battery-friendly on iOS 26These settings are tried-and-true and work just as well in iOS 26:1) Stop your iPhone from searching for towersGo to SettingsTap Airplane ModeTurn it ONThen go back to Wi-Fi in Settings and turn Wi-Fi ON manuallyThis keeps your iPhone from wasting power looking for nonexistent cell service.2) Keep Wi-Fi Calling enabledOpen Settings.Scroll down and tap Apps.Click Phone.Tap Wi-Fi Calling.Make sure “Wi-Fi Calling on This iPhone” is switched ON.3) Reduce background activityBackground App Refresh: Settings → General → Background App Refresh → set to Wi-Fi only or turn it off for apps you don’t need.Mail Fetch: Settings → Apps →Mail → Accounts → Fetch New Data → change to Manually or set a longer interval like Every 30 minutes or Every 15 Minutes. 4) Cut screen and system drainBrightness: Settings → Display & Brightness → lower brightness or use Auto-Brightness by clicking Automatic. Location Services: Settings → Privacy & Security → Location Services → turn off for apps that don’t need it.5) Keep Wi-Fi connection strongPlace your phone closer to the routerConsider upgrading to a mesh Wi-Fi system if your signal drops across the houseYOUR PHONE IS TRACKING YOU EVEN WHEN YOU THINK IT’S NOT IOS 26 adds new battery analytics to track and manage power use. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)What iOS 26 adds to the mixApple didn’t change how Wi-Fi calling itself works in iOS 26, but it did improve how you can monitor and manage battery use:Adaptive Power (on supported iPhones): This feature adjusts things like screen brightness, refresh rates and background tasks automatically when your battery starts draining faster than usual.New battery analytics: iOS 26 shows a single weekly average view with clearer breakdowns of which apps and processes are using power. To check this: Open Settings → scroll down and tap Battery→ the Weekly view of average battery use appears by default → tap a bar to see a specific day’s app and process usage → scroll down and tap Show All Battery Usage to view Screen Active vs. Screen Idle time and charging history alongside the updated weekly statsThese tools don’t remove Wi-Fi calling’s overhead, but they give you better visibility and, in some cases, automatic tweaks to help stretch your charge.How Wi-Fi calling affects battery on AndroidAndroid users face many of the same challenges as iPhone owners when it comes to Wi-Fi calling and battery drain. The basic reasons overlap; extra processes, Wi-Fi radios staying active and unstable signals. But Android also has some unique quirks and settings worth adjusting.Settings may vary depending on your Android phone’s manufacturer Your phone still scans for cell towersEven when Wi-Fi calling is on, your Android device may keep searching for mobile networks in the background. This constant scan eats up power unless you turn it off.Fix: Enable Airplane Mode, then manually switch Wi-Fi back on. To do this open Settings, tap Network & Internet, and turn on Airplane Mode. Once it’s active, go back into Wi-Fi, switch it on manually and reconnect to your network so Wi-Fi calling still works without the phone constantly searching for cell towers.Carrier settings differNot every carrier handles Wi-Fi calling the same way on Android. Some route calls differently, which can use more energy depending on the network.Fix: Check your carrier’s Wi-Fi calling preferences in Settings → Network & Internet → Mobile Network → Advanced → Wi-Fi Calling.Background apps can pile onUnlike iOS, many Android devices allow dozens of apps to keep running in the background. When Wi-Fi calling is active, that extra load can drain faster.Fix: Go to Settings → Battery → Battery Usage and identify apps draining the most power, then restrict background activity.Adaptive battery and power-saving modesMost Android phones (Pixel, Samsung Galaxy, OnePlus, etc.) include Adaptive Battery or similar power-saving tools. These features limit battery-hungry apps when Wi-Fi calling is active.Fix: Enable Adaptive Battery in Settings → Battery → Adaptive Preferences, or use Power Saving mode if you notice faster drain during calls.Strengthen your Wi-Fi signalAs with iPhones, weak Wi-Fi is a big culprit. Dropped or unstable Wi-Fi forces your Android phone to work overtime to keep a call steady.Fix: Stay near your router or consider upgrading to a mesh Wi-Fi system.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPKurt’s key takeawaysWi-Fi calling is a lifesaver when you’re off the grid, but it does come with trade-offs. It can use more power than a strong cellular connection, especially if your Wi-Fi signal isn’t steady. The good news is that iOS 26 gives you better battery insights and smarter tools to help manage power. With a few simple tweaks, like turning on Airplane Mode when there’s no service, limiting background apps and keeping your Wi-Fi strong, you can cut unnecessary drain.What’s been your biggest challenge with your phone’s battery life, and how do you manage it? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.  

Why Wi-Fi calling may be killing your phone’s battery life Read More »

1 dodging a digital bullet my close call with a work email scam intro

Scammers now impersonate coworkers, steal email threads in convincing phishing attacks

Key Takeaways: 1. Phishing emails are becoming more convincing by impersonating people you trust, like coworkers or employers. 2. Cybercriminals are using advanced techniques like AI-generated text to create more sophisticated scams. 3. To protect yourself, monitor for signs of compromise, use password managers, install antivirus software, and enable account alerts. Cyber expert Kurt Knutsson

Scammers now impersonate coworkers, steal email threads in convincing phishing attacks Read More »

blobid1759801986147

Spectacular Cases of Mass UFO Sightings

Of all of the UFO sightings and encounters on record, very few can claim to have been witnessed by more than a few people at a time at best. These are typically very isolated incidents, seen by only small groups of people at most, and this has only further served to generate doubt on the part of skeptics or for those who place no veracity on UFO phenomena as a whole. Yet, every once in a while, there are truly spectacular cases of mass sightings that get plenty of documentation and exposure. Although rarer than most accounts, such mass sightings typically provide a rich variety of witnesses, many of them often very trusted people in social high standing, or professionals, trained personnel, and experts. They often serve to be harder to explain away than typical sightings, and usually earn their place among the more bizarre UFO accounts.  
One of the most intriguing mass UFO sighting flaps in U.S. history started as a normal day like any other in the small suburban town of Wanaque, New Jersey, but as the day came to a close, a bizarre series of events would begin to play out. On the crisp and clear evening of January 11, 1966, at around 6:30 PM, calls began to come in from all over the area describing what seemed to be an extremely bright glowing light out over the nearby Wanaque Reservoir. Dozens of calls were coming in from panicked residents and workers at the reservoir describing more or less the same thing, with most reports saying it was a very bright light, larger and brighter than a star, mostly white but sometimes changing to colors such as red, blue and green. The mystery object was described as hovering over the frozen lake surface and roving about in what seemed to be a deliberate pattern at an altitude of between 250 and 1,000 feet, sometimes performing seemingly physics-defying maneuvers and sudden vertical drops and rises. Even weirder were the reports of the object projecting some sort of beam downwards to the reservoir, which was powerful enough to melt holes in the ice.
Before long, the police who were getting these calls were seeing the strange object for themselves, and one of these was police patrolman Joseph Cisco, who just happened to be near the reservoir when the reports began flooding in. He would then drive out there to investigate and look out over the water to see something very strange for himself, of which he said:

“There was a light that looked bigger than any of the stars, about the size of a softball or volleyball. It was a pulsating, white, stationary light changing to red. It stayed in the air; there was no noise. I was trying to figure out what it was.”

The object would then swoop in low and begin shooting a beam to the lake surface, and Cisco soon got a call from another officer on the radio, saying in a panic, “Something landed in front of the dam. Something’s burning a hole in the ice! Something with a bright light on it, going up and down!” Another policeman who saw the thing was Sgt. Ben Thompson, who said it actually caused the water to rise below it and sucked together treetops, and yet another Officer George Dyckman would say, “I’ve never seen anything like it in my life.” Several other police officers being called to the area also saw the otherworldly object, including Patrolmen Edward Nestor and Jack Wardlaw, a Sgt. Bobby Gordon, Reservoir Police and Personnel, George Destito, Charles Theodora, Fred Steines, and even Chief of Police Floyd Elson. Chief John Casazza of the Wanaque Reservoir Police would say of his own sighting:

“It was a bright white light. As I said: just like on a locomotive. It was funnel-shaped. It seemed to come out of some object, like a funnel. In other words, it spread out as if it were focused through a telescope. It was narrow at one end in the sky and spread out into a very wide beam as it approached our upper gatehouse at the dam. The strangest part of it was that there was no noise attached to this object. None whatsoever. It was absolutely silent. A silent light.”

News crews who started to trickle in also reported seeing the strange sight, with one reporter, Howard Ball, with the Paterson News, saying:

“I was near the junction of Colfax Road and Hamburg Turnpike… I saw a very extremely bright light… The thing that really brought my attention was, as I traveled along, a white starlight seems to come at me… then it stopped and it made a transverse movement to the west. No color, but if I’d give it a color I’d say brilliant blue-white, similar to the ignition of a magnesium and pure oxygen… really bright light.”

One of the more prominent witnesses to the outlandish event was the town Mayor, Harry T. Wolfe, who had made his way out to the reservoir along with Councilmen Warren Hagstrom and Arthur Barton and the Mayor’s 14-year-old son, Billy, out of sheer curiosity when the reports kept coming in a deluge. They would witness a light that was “a brilliance, a little brighter than a star” that seemed to emit a reddish or pale green light or yellowish light and which was moving “oddly” over the lake. Closer inspection showed that it was some sort of oval-shaped object around 9 feet in diameter, coming in low over the water to shoot down a beam that put a hole in the ice as they looked on in astonishment. Councilman Hagstrom would say of what they saw that night:

“There was something up there that was awful bright. We don’t know what it was. We thought it was a helicopter, but we didn’t hear a motor. It looked like a helicopter with big landing lights on. We got goose bumps all over when we saw where the hole was.”

Before long, there were throngs of people gathered at the reservoir watching this thing go about its inscrutable business, and the mysterious object would do its strange act over the water for over an hour before finally speeding off into the night at great speed and without warning. Moments later, it would be reported as hovering over Lakeland Regional High School and stopping at several other locations in the area before vanishing to leave residents in a state of shock. So many people had seen it, including many policemen and even city officials, and all of them agreed it was not a normal aircraft or celestial phenomenon, but rather something truly unexplainable and baffling. To make it all even weirder still is that it would seem as if the strangeness wasn’t quite over yet. The object would make another brief appearance over the reservoir the following evening as well, before seeming to go away for good, but it would make yet another appearance later that year.
In October of 1966, just as people were starting to try and put the whole bizarre incident at Wanaque reservoir out of their minds, a new spate of sightings emanated from the lake. At 9 PM on October 10, the object was seen by several witnesses, including an off-duty police officer by the name of Robert Gordon, who saw it with his wife, Betty, who described it as a bright white light that moved with “a definite pattern” towards the reservoir. This sighting was soon joined by that of a policeman, Sgt. Ben Thompson, who had seen the object during its first appearance, and had quite a harrowing experience when the UFO allegedly flew right at him and he saw it at fairly close quarters. He would say of this:

“I saw the object coming at me. There was an extremely bright light. It was a bright white light, bright like when a light bulb is about to blow. It was very low. It appeared to be about 75 feet over the mountain. That would be Windbeam Mountain. It was traveling very quickly and in a definite pattern; first right, then up and down, then repeating the pattern. Distances are deceiving, but it might have covered an area of a half a mile. It went straight over my head, stopped in mid-air and backed right up. It then started zig-zagging from left to right. It was doing tricks. Making acute angular turns instead of gradual curved ones. It looked as big as a parachute. I got out of my car and continued to watch it for almost five minutes. It was about 200 to 250 yards away. It was the shape of a basketball with the center scooped out and a football thrust through it. Sometimes the football appeared to be perpendicular to the basketball and sometimes standing up on end. There were two different gadgets. It didn’t make much noise, but as it was moving, it raised the water beneath it. I watched it maneuver, stirring up brush and water in the reservoir, it was about 150 feet up…I had difficulty seeing because the light was so bright it blinded me.”

Once again, the police were flooded with dozens of calls from terrified residents seeing the object in the vicinity of the reservoir, and it would be seen again on October 15 before finally disappearing again, this time apparently for good. In the wake of the UFO flap over Wanaque reservoir, there would be some strange and sometimes ominous stories coming out of the area. It was reported that unknown men posing as military officials from the Air Force were doing the rounds in the area, intimidating residents and discouraging people from talking about what they had seen, and some people even claimed that these mysterious men had confiscated photographs taken of the phenomena. The military would deny that these people were with them, or that they had had anyone in the area to investigate at all, and one Air Force Colonel Freeman would state, “We have checked a number of these cases and these men are not connected with the Air Force in any way.” Other witnesses would also insist that they had seen military helicopters and even jets in the area shortly after the initial sightings and in the months after, but the Air Force denied this as well, while at the same time making efforts to explain away the UFO sightings as misidentified aircraft or a weather balloon. What happened here, and did the military have any connection to these events or not? Were they trying to hide something or cover it up? No one knows.
The claims of mysterious officials confiscating photographic evidence are cited as one of the reasons there is so little such documentation of the incident. Indeed, although the UFO was witnessed by so many people, including police and high-ranking officials, there is oddly only a handful of photographs of the alleged craft known to exist, most of which were later sent in anonymously to make it hard to ascertain who took them in the first place or whether they are real or hoaxes. One photo in particular, showing the object shooting a beam of light downwards, has become intensely debated and analyzed in the years since, with no real conclusion. Since we don’t know who took these photos and have no negatives, it is hard to say. What we do know is that the incident did happen, and so this odd lack of photographic evidence from such a well-documented mass sighting has been seen as proof that someone has tried to suppress the event.
Today, there have been many proposed explanations, including helicopters with spotlights, atmospheric phenomena, Venus, weather balloons, or even ball lightning, but there are problems with these explanations in that so many reliable witnesses saw them and insist that what they witnessed was none of these things. One unidentified witness has said of this to researcher Anthony Bragalia, of UFO Explorations, as follows:

“I remember the thing very well. I still do not know what it was. I think about it from time to time, but it’s no use because it doesn’t bring me any closer to knowing what it was. Maybe things that aren’t from here aren’t meant to be understood by us here. Ask anyone who will tell you, it was not a helicopter or something astronomical. It was…not…from our military or something we misidentified. It was a UFO, from somewhere else. The beams or ray thing that came out from the bottom of the globe was the thing that got to me. It made the light cut the ice out. It frightened us kids. And I’m sure the adults. Because we don’t have anything like that even today. The adults didn’t really speak much about it after the initial thing that I could tell. I’d talk about it with my friends some time later and one of them told me that people came around to not say anything.”

Amazingly, there has apparently been very little follow-up investigation done into the case. It seems that no one ever went back to examine those holes in the ice, nor were there any water or radiation measurements taken, and the proper authorities don’t seem to have ever made any real efforts to interview witnesses. Most of what we know is from independent UFO researchers who pieced together what happened from newspaper articles of the time. We are left to wonder just what happened out over that expanse of frigid ice all of those decades ago and what it all means. Was this all the result of mundane phenomena and misidentification, or something else? Has there been some sort of cover-up put into effect that has managed to keep such a spectacular incident largely buried in history? If this was really an alien craft, then what was it doing at that reservoir, and what did it want? These are questions that linger, and which may never be satisfactorily answered, and the UFO wave of New Jersey’s Wanaque reservoir remains a very compelling case of a mass UFO sighting that has been largely forgotten.
Moving on to our next case, on July 11, 1991, a total solar eclipse occurred from the Pacific Ocean to Brazil, passing over Hawaii, Mexico, Central America, and South America. In Mexico City, Mexico, thousands of people were out to get a look at the rare celestial event that day. Two of these observers were Guillermo Arragin, a television executive, and Jaime Maussan, a journalist, who were shocked to notice a bright, disk-like metallic object hovering in the sky and were able to videotape it easily, as they had already been taping the eclipse. They sent the tape to Jaime Maussan, who produced, directed and hosted Sesenta Minutos, Mexico’s edition of Sixty Minutes. When this footage was shown on TV eight days later, it started a deluge of others calling in to report that they had seen or videotaped the same thing during the eclipse, of which Maussan would say:

“The telephone lines blew up. I mean 40,000 calls at the same time. Then the system was completely shut out. We received more than 15 videos and we now know for sure that in at least 7 of them, we can see the same ship that was recorded by Guillermo Arragin.”

It would turn out that many thousands of people had seen the mysterious object, and all of them described the same metallic shining object, with some reports stating it merely hovered in a stationary position, while others said it moved around while leaving a vaporous trail in its wake, and there were also mentions of the thing having three blinking lights on it. After this, it seems that whatever it was disappeared as the sun emerged once again to bring broad daylight. Among the many people sending in videos of the thing was 19-year-old student Erick Aguilar, who saw it while videotaping the eclipse from a rooftop with his friends and girlfriend. He would describe it as looking like a white point of light that got bigger and brighter as they watched it. At the same time, about 60 miles from Mexico City, a businessman named Luis Lara videotaped an object that was identical to the one on Aguilar’s footage, and he was convinced it was not a star, explaining that there was some sort of dark shadow under the object. The Breton family also filmed a similar object in Puebla, eighty miles from Mexico City, and they described the object as pulsating and having a strange wave-like disturbance behind it. It is unclear if this was the same object or a different one. In total, there were over a dozen videos of what seemed to be the same object from different angles and distances, making it one of the most videotaped UFOs ever. 
After this appearance on Sesenta Minutos, the UFO sightings were all over the news, becoming a sensation in Mexico and sparking a mass hysteria, and this was only further fueled when a similar object was spotted just two months later at a military air show at Mexico City. On this occasion, an engineer named Vincente Sanchez was filming the air show when he noticed something very bizarre up in the air with those planes. He would say of it:

“I was following one of the planes and I saw a shiny dot in the camera. It didn’t fly like a plane; it was undulating. I didn’t know what it was so I let the planes go off and I focused more on this shiny dot in the sky. What I saw was a bright, round object, about 10 meters in diameter. It was made of silver, was shining very brightly and reflected the sunlight a lot. The object appeared, undulated, and moved around quickly.”

The object would be seen again at the same air show a year later, this time with the disc descending rapidly to seemingly vanish into thin air. At the same air show in 1993, it was seen yet again, this time apparently flying in close proximity to a squadron of helicopters. It is not clear if these sightings have any connection to the mass sighting on July 11, 1991, but at the time, many were linking them and even claiming they were the very same object. Over the years, the various footage taken on July 11, 1991, has been debated and analyzed, and one astronomer by the name of Tim Printy has given a pretty good argument that it was all down to the planet Venus. As evidence, he states that the object can’t be conclusively shown to be moving in any of the videos, the alignment of the object in the footage in relation to other celestial objects shown in some of the videos, such as Mars and Regulus, correlates to the position of where Venus should be, and the object disappears when the sun comes back out. Most damningly, he points out that not a single Mexican astronomer, of which there would have been many recording the eclipse, reported any UFO or anything out of the ordinary at all. According to Printy, the videos only appear to show something truly strange because of camera artifacts and the fact that there are no uncropped videos of the object, which makes it all appear even more mysterious. 

Nevertheless, despite such criticism of the videos, many still believe them to be good UFO evidence, and some have gone and to take it all to new levels of weirdness. One of these is a couple by the name of Lee and Brit Elders, who believe that the UFO appearance during the eclipse was not only aliens, but that the whole incident was prophesied by the Mayans more than 1200 years ago. The Elders claim that through various ancient documents, they have deduced that the Mayans predicted that the aliens would arrive in the area of Mexico City on July 11, 1991, as harbingers of world change and “cosmic awareness through encounters with masters of the stars,” to usher in “a new era that will rise on the ashes of the one before.” The couple even made a whole series of videos talking about this, titled Messengers of Destiny, Masters of the Stars, and Voyagers of the Sixth Sun, and it all revolves around this supposed ancient prophecy and the July 11, 1991, UFO over Mexico City. Printy has a lot to say about the Elders, and does not mince words at all when he says of what he calls their “pure bunk for sale”:

“Not only do the Elder’s state that Venus was a UFO, but they also make a profound statement that the Mayans predicted the arrival of the UFOs! Exactly when did the Maya predict such an event? The Elders state there are several ancient documents that state this. However, is there any basis for such a claim? The Elders rarely, if ever, give details. They seem to expound on new age mysticism trying to link statements from various documents in order to create some strange prediction to meet their needs. Are their statements correct? Are these source documents accurate? The credibility of the Elders is important to understand how accurately they represented the UFOs shown in the videos.
Despite a wealth of evidence that Venus was the likely culprit in many of these videos, the Elders went out of their way to create a story that describes alien visitation. The mixing and matching of Mayan and Aztec myths and then trying to make some form of prediction made by the Maya is another case of the Elders trying to deceive the viewers of real facts. The Mexico City eclipse UFO story is nothing but a new age myth generated by a couple of con-artists, who rely on the viewer to be uninformed and willing to believe the most ridiculous claims. The Messengers of Destiny/Masters of the Stars/Voyagers of the sixth sun prediction is nothing but a new age myth designed to make money!”

The Mexican UFO has also been the source of conspiracies, such as one that states the U.S. government knew about the event in Mexico, but tried to suppress it so that the public would not panic, which is supposedly why the story failed to produce even a blip in the American news. According to a report from the site Cool Interesting Stuff, there was a Kremlin report that supposedly not only mentions this, but also that the incident of July 11, 1991, in Mexico City put the Americans on alert for a “war” against UFOs based on or near the Continent of Antarctica.” The site says:

“A report circulating in the Kremlin prepared for President Medvedev by Russian Space Forces (VKS) 45th Division of Space Control says that an upcoming WikiLeaks release of secret US cables details that the Americans have been “engaged” since 2004 in a “war” against UFO’s based on or near the Continent of Antarctica, particularly the Southern Ocean. According to this report, the United States went to its highest alert level on June 10, 2004 after a massive fleet of UFO’s “suddenly emerged” from the Southern Ocean and approached Guadalajara, Mexico barely 1,600 kilometers (1,000 miles) from the American border. Prior to reaching the US border, however, this massive UFO fleet is said in this report to have “dimensionally returned” to their Southern Ocean “home base.”
The fears of the Americans regarding these Southern Ocean UFO’s began, this report says, during the unprecedented events of July 11, 1991 (referred to as 7/11) when during the Solar Eclipse these mysterious aircraft appeared by the hundreds over nearly all of Mexico, even their Capital city. Most notable about the events of 7/11 were that as millions of Mexicans were watching on their televisions the National broadcasts of these UFO’s over Mexico City, the American media refused to allow their people to view it.”

Is there anything to this? What was going on here with this incident? Was this an otherworldly presence, celestial gods on some mission to fulfill a Mayan prophecy, or merely the planet Venus and mass hysteria? How can we account for so many sightings? Were they all misidentifying a mundane phenomenon? Whatever the case may be, the July 11, 1991, UFO flap over Mexico City has gone on to become one of the most widely witnessed and most videotaped UFO encounters there is, and it remains a curious case in the annals of ufology. 
Moving along, the beginning of what has gone on to be one of the most talked about mass UFO sighting incidents in recent memory was on March 30, 1993, in England. On this evening, there suddenly began a deluge of reports coming in from across a swath of southwest England, particularly in the vicinity of Shropshire, of something decidedly weird in the sky, from witnesses of all walks of life and many of them traditionally reliable witnesses. One of the first reports came from a policeman who claimed to have seen a massive object resembling “two Concordes flying side by side and joined together,” and there were other reports that put the object’s size at a massive 200 meters long. Other reports claimed that the object had been observed sometimes flying very low to the ground, and there was even a panicked resident who claimed that it had landed in a field. Dozens of reports like this came in, and curiously, people were giving different descriptions, including a cylindrical object, a triangular-shaped craft with three lights, and a pair of lights seeming to emit a tail-like plume, suggesting there was more than one aerial disturbance at work. Yet this was only the beginning.

Continuing into March 31st, 1993, the reports kept coming in, and it seemed as if the phenomena had gotten even more active. The evening of the 31st would also mark a series of high-level sightings from police and military personnel, who had been on alert due to the sheer number of anomalous reports the night before. There would be several sightings made from RAF bases in the region, including sightings of a fast-moving red light by personnel at RAF Cosford and another incident at RAF Shawbury. One meteorologist at RAF Shawbury by the name of Wayne Elliot would claim that a triangular-shaped craft measuring around 200 feet across had slowly approached his base while emitting a low humming noise, and then shot a bright beam of light towards the ground before shooting off at amazing speed while leaving a luminous vapor trail in its wake. At no point were any of these objects picked up on radar at the bases. Some of the reports were scattered over a wide area, as another military encounter with one of the objects allegedly happened to an Irish military helicopter en route to Ireland over the coast of southwest Wales. The crew would report seeing “two white lights at a fixed distance apart in the horizontal plane” with trails visible through night vision equipment, which appeared to close the distance and pace them for a time.
The sightings were investigated by Nick Pope, who ran the UFO project run by the British Ministry of Defense (MoD), and he collected a steady stream of the reports, which he described as “coming in thick and fast,” in particular from the areas of Devon, Cornwall and Wales. Pope would claim to gather several hundred eyewitness reports of the bizarre unidentified aerial phenomena from March 30 and 31, and he also asserted that it was such a major and anomalous incident that it had even captured the attention of military officials at the Pentagon, who he believed included it in their 490-page secret report under the part of the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program. Pope  has said of this:

“The Cosford Incident was the most high-profile and compelling UFO incident that took place during my time on the MoD’s UFO project in the early Nineties. It is probably among the best cases in our entire archive, which goes back decades and includes around 12,000 sightings. It is inconceivable to me that this wouldn’t be one of the incidents mentioned in the secret US report. I’m sure the Americans knew all about the Cosford Incident, and maybe conducted some discreet enquiries of their own.”

Despite how amazing this may all seem, we are still left to wonder about just what exactly was seen by all of these witnesses, and there has been much debate on the matter. One very prevalent theory is that the aerial phenomena were caused by some kind of falling space debris, notably the re-entry of a Russian satellite called the Cosmos 2238, which it turns out was scheduled to re-enter the atmosphere on the evening of March 31. This would not be out of the question, as falling space debris has caused UFO flaps before, and incidentally, a similar Cosmos satellite that had gone down in the winter of 1978 also coincided with a wave of UFO sightings. 
A reentering satellite might explain some of the sightings, but it would not really explain the fact that many of the reports describe distinctly triangular objects that were allegedly seen flying in a seemingly intelligently controlled manner, including changing speed, hovering, or flying low to the ground, even in one case landing and taking off, which doesn’t really fit in with the space debris theory. The Russian satellite angle also would not explain the sightings going on during the evening of March 30, nor the insistence of some very trained witnesses that these were not space debris. So what are some of the other possibilities? Other ideas are that this was some sort of top-secret experimental aircraft being tested, a military black op, or some strange atmospheric phenomenon. There is also the possibility that this was just a misidentified normal aircraft, such as an airplane or helicopter. One local police investigator has said of this likelihood:

“If there’s no full moon you would not necessarily see the shape of the aircraft just the three lights and perhaps the searchlight. On a number of occasions in the last nine years we have had people ringing the police to report UFOs and when we have checked our operation logs it has turned out to be our helicopter. On other occasions we have had people reporting UFOs who have actually seen airliners descending into Manchester who have switched their landing lights on or off. Most people have no idea of spatial awareness at night and cannot accurately judge the height or distance. We have had people saying they have seen things at treetop height and when we have checked it has been an aircraft descending into Manchester at 10,000 feet or more.”

One argument against this is that many of the observers were reliable, trained witnesses such as RAF personnel, police officers, and the meteorologist, so how could they all misidentify a helicopter or plane? UFO investigator Chris Fowler has addressed this by explaining the problems with leaning too heavily on supposed expert witnesses, pointing out that even trained and seasoned individuals can be fooled by innate problems with our senses of perception. Fowler says of this:

“The human visual perceptual system and cognizance are very discerning but easily fooled by events like those described here. It is part of common UFO reportage that lights and aircraft flying at night can lead to false reports of distance, altitude, time estimates, size and other fundamental attributes. We should take note all observers are fallible to misperception and illusory effects and to false interpretation and apply adequate reasoning here. These 1993 events may be exemplary in providing more evidence of the inability of those often described as ‘trained observers’ to discern altitude in lights than is supposed. It is fallacious to assume that certain subsets of people, by occupation, may be more or less accurate in their observations of lights, shapes, distance and altitude without providing evidence. Observational accuracy by any subset of witnesses depends upon circumstance and a willingness to apply useful pragmatic means to recording observations at the time and on some understanding of limitations.”

One of the problems with trying to get to the bottom of the Cosford Incident is that Nick Pope has been accused by skeptics and even others within the UFO field of being a bit overzealous in his approach and too willing to try and fit everything into his own preconceived theories. He has been accused of cherry-picking, twisting and misrepresenting data to fit his needs, leading witnesses in interviews into the outcomes he wants, and generally exaggerating certain elements of the cases, giving misleading statements, or leaving out certain information to misrepresent the facts. For instance, although Pope has admitted that some of the sightings could have been space debris, he rarely mentions this, instead focusing on the more bizarre and mysterious sightings and elements. UFO researcher Gary Anthony has criticized Pope’s approach in relation to his participation in a documentary of the incident called The British UFO Mystery – Stranger Than Fiction, saying of it:

“After watching the documentary myself, I wondered if Nick Pope had lost the real plot or not because in places there were exaggerative comments and the reports were misrepresented both by Nick and in the visual continuity and the narrating voice. The presentation was more geared towards Pope’s own personal and theatrical interpretation of the sightings and was laid out fallaciously for an unsuspecting public.  Relevant information was not included, witness participation was minimal and some of the facts presented were grossly out of context. He clearly has fallen into the trap of not recognizing salient features and errors of multiple witness reports, making links that do not exist and falling back on the questionable prowess of ‘trained observers,’ endowed with super-human abilities of discerning distance, altitudes and size in lights seen at night. A real house of cards. The programme featured only one witness, a lady who saw a row of lights whilst driving home. For the 45-minute plus feature exclusively on these sightings none of the official witnesses used to bolster the theme appeared.”

In the end, the whole incident has sort of quietly been brushed away, and is rarely talked about outside of UFO circles, despite how many witnesses there apparently were. What was going on here? Was this merely space debris? Was it experimental aircraft, aliens, atmospheric phenomena, or all of the above? How reliable is Pope’s documentation of the supposed events, and is there anything we are missing? There is no way to really know the answers to such questions and others like them, and we are left to wonder just what went on over the English countryside in March of 1993.

Finally, what has gone on to become one of the most well-known and oft-discussed, and debated mass UFO sightings in history is widely accepted as having started on March 13, 1997, in the skies over Henderson, Nevada, in the United States. Here, a witness claimed that at approximately 6:55 PM, he saw a large, V-shaped object about the same size as a passenger airliner with a formation of six lights along its front edge, which flew across the sky at a good clip with a sort of whooshing noise to disappear to the southeast. This same object would soon after be witnessed by a police officer from Paulden, Arizona, at around 8:15 PM, who said that he saw a triangular formation of four mysterious lights trailed by a fifth, and claimed to have watched the strange sight through his binoculars as they travelled south.
This would be the beginning of one of the most famous UFO cases there is. Before long, there were sightings of something strange in the sky coming in from the area of Prescott, Arizona, and the Prescott Valley. Many of the witnesses at the time described it as being definitely solid, blocking out the stars and the sky as it passed over, and it was mostly explained as being rather enormous. One witness who saw the boomerang-shaped object said it was massive, at least a mile wide, stating:

“We don’t have anything that big. It was totally silent. I’ve never seen anything even close to the colors from the exhaust that propelled that thing. It was as big as downtown Prescott and completely blocked out the stars.”

The object or objects were usually described as being a V-shaped or wedge-shaped formation of red or orange lights, with the leading light being a bright white, usually said to be embedded within a solid object, but descriptions varied, and they were sometimes claimed to be separate lights moving independently. At the time, there were dozens of witnesses from all ages and walks of life observing it as it made its way inexorably towards Phoenix to the southeast. The lights were also seen from the nearby town of Dewey, around 10 miles away, and as they drew closer to the greater Phoenix area, there would be a deluge of people seeing whatever it was that had come in from out of the unknown.

The phenomenon reached Phoenix at around 8:30 PM, after which it hovered over the area for around two hours, being seen by thousands of people in the process. During this time, it seems that there were actually two separate events going on over the region at the same time, with one being the massive V-shaped group of lights moving through the air, and a second formation of lights south of Phoenix that seemed to be stationary or moving very slowly. These lights, which would go on to collectively be known as the “Phoenix Lights,” were seen by people from all walks of life, including police officers, pilots, military personnel, and even the governor, none of whom could come up with any explanation for what was going on. While most of the reports described some massive solid object, an interesting aspect of it all is that witness descriptions of the phenomena tended to vary to quite a wide degree, of which UFOlogist Peter B. Davenport has said:

“Witnesses were reporting such markedly different objects and events that night that it was difficult for investigators to understand what was taking place. Some witnesses reported five lights, others seven, or even more. Some reported that the lights were distinctly orange or red, whereas others reported distinctly white or yellow lights. Many reported the lights were moving across the sky at seemingly high speed, whereas others reported they moved at a slow (angular) velocity, or they even hovered for several minutes.”

The objects were being seen all over the place at the time, seen in places as far away as Las Vegas, New Mexico, and northern Mexico, always inspiring awe and dread. In the meantime, the media didn’t really seem to show much interest in it, and officials seemed to treat it as a big joke, with Arizona Governor Fife Symington III holding a press conference on the situation flanked by an aide wearing an alien costume. However, when the story hit USA Today, it blew up into national news, appearing all over newspapers and TV shows. The USA Today piece was quite sensational, including the line, “The incident over Arizona was the most dramatic I’ve seen. . . . What we have here is the real thing. They are here,” and people ate it up. Before long, the Phoenix lights were being talked about and widely discussed all over the nation, with theories being thrown about as to what the phenomenon could have been, which is made somewhat complicated by the fact that it seems that there were two separate phenomena going on at the same time, the large moving object and the hovering lights.
One of the main ideas put forward was that at least the second event concerning the stationary lights was simply flares dropped by the military during a nighttime training exercise, but this has been challenged by many. Curiously, one of the main opponents of the flare theory was the governor himself, who would end up later changing his tune entirely, claiming to have seen the lights himself, and he would say of this:

“As a pilot and a former Air Force Officer, I can definitively say that this craft did not resemble any man made object I’d ever seen. And it was certainly not high-altitude flares because flares don’t fly in formation. It was enormous and inexplicable. Who knows where it came from? A lot of people saw it, and I saw it too. It was dramatic. And it couldn’t have been flares because it was too symmetrical. It had a geometric outline, a constant shape. I’m a pilot and I know just about every machine that flies. It was bigger than anything that I’ve ever seen. It remains a great mystery.”

Symington also found it odd that his attempts to get more information from the government on what was going on out there were shot down with basically “no comment,” and that no government agency had made any effort to seriously investigate. Another opponent of the flare theory was UFO enthusiast Jim Dilettoso, who claimed that he had done a full spectral analysis of the lights in one of the videos and determined that they could not have possibly come from a manmade source. However, considering that such an analysis on video footage images would be inaccurate, this has been criticized as an incomplete analysis at best. It has also been pointed out that the wind direction and speed at the time were consistent with flares as to the movement seen with the pattern of lights, which also supports the flare theory, as does the fact that the lights seemed to dip over the horizon and disappear, very much as flares would do. With regards to at least this aspect of the event, even UFOlogists have conceded that it could have been flares in this case.

A photo of the Phoenix Lights

The first event, which covers that huge, light-studded craft moving over the state and blocking out the stars, has been more difficult to explain. Skeptics say that it was just a formation of high altitude aircraft flying in formation on a classified mission, the blackened sky just an illusion. This has been corroborated by amateur astronomer Mitch Stanley, who claims that on the night of the incident, he had observed the large V-shaped craft through a telescope to find that it was unambiguously an aircraft, specifically a formation of five planes that were either A-10s or possibly T-37 fighter-trainers. However, many of the thousands of witnesses have denied that this could have been the case; the planes were apparently not picked up on radar, and the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson did not assert that they had any aircraft in the air at the time. In the end, it all remains a curious oddity, of which one investigator with the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) has said:

“Do we have evidence that it was an extraterrestrial event? No. We have evidence that it was an extremely bizarre event. We can’t put a label on it other than it was an anomaly.”

Interestingly, there have been reemergences of the lights in later years that have been explained as flares. On February 6, 2007, almost the same thing was seen over Phoenix, and military officials were quick to admit that it was flares they had dropped, and on April 21, 2008, there was another wave of sightings of the lights, this time found to be flares attached to balloons. Yet, the sightings that remain the most well-known are the original 1997 incident and whatever was behind it all, the Phoenix Lights have continued to have a place among the greatest, most extensively seen and documented UFO sightings ever, and remain mostly a mystery.
There can be no doubt that mass sightings such as what we’ve looked at here are the most spectacular type of UFO sightings there is. What were these people seeing, and how can we explain it rationally when so many people are seeing the same thing, often very traditionally reliable witnesses? Are these cases of misidentifying Venus or other aerial or atmospheric phenomena? Is it flares or balloons, or whatever official report it is, they want you to believe? How can you tell hundreds of people that they did not see what they think they did? If these are extraterrestrial in nature, then why would they want to be so widely seen in these cases? Whatever the answers may be, mass UFO sightings are among the most exciting and well-documented in the field. 

Spectacular Cases of Mass UFO Sightings Read More »

north korea infiltration american tech companies fox news 002

She helped North Korea infiltrate American tech companies

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
This isn’t a ripped-from-the-headlines new Netflix series. This really happened in a quiet neighborhood called Litchfield Park that’s about a 20-minute drive from Phoenix.Christina Chapman, 50, looked like your average middle-aged suburban woman. But inside her humble home? A secret cyber ops center built to help North Korean IT workers buy equipment and tools for their military by infiltrating hundreds of U.S. companies. WOMAN LEARNS FATE AFTER DOJ GUILTY PLEA ADMITTING SHE HELPED NORTH KOREAN TECH WORKERS INFILTRATE US COMPANIES Christina Chapman, 50, of Litchfield Park, Ariz., set up a massive cyber operation that helped North Korean actors infiltrate U.S. companies. (Department of Justice)That picture above was just a small part of her setup.North Korean workers aren’t browsing LinkedIn or applying at Google, Amazon and Meta. They can’t. Sanctions block them from working for American companies, at least legally. So what do they do? They steal real Americans’ identities, including names, birth dates, Social Security numbers and more. Then, they use them to pose as remote IT workers, slipping into U.S. companies under anyone’s radar.But when companies send out laptops and phones to their “remote new hires”? Those devices can’t exactly be shipped to Pyongyang.Enter ChristinaOver the course of three years, Christina turned her suburban home into a covert operations hub for North Korea’s elite cybercriminals.She received more than 100 laptops and smartphones shipped from companies all across the U.S. These weren’t no-name startups. We’re talking major American banks, top-tier tech firms and at least one U.S. government contractor. All thought they were hiring remote U.S.-based workers. They had no idea they were actually onboarding North Korean operatives.Once the gear arrived, Chapman connected the devices to VPNs, remote desktop tools like AnyDesk and Chrome Remote Desktop, and even rigged up voice-changing software. The goal? To make it seem like the North Koreans were logging in from inside the United States. Chapman also shipped 49 laptops and other devices supplied by U.S. companies to locations overseas, including multiple shipments to a city in China on the border with North Korea.NORTH KOREA LASHES OUT AFTER TRUMP DOJ EXPOSES MASSIVE IT INFILTRATION SCHEME Chapman’s fake employees “showed up” from halfway around the world every day, siphoning American cash and technology directly into the Kim regime. (Department of Justice)Follow the moneyThese fake employees “showed up” every day, submitting code, answering emails, taking meetings, all from halfway around the world. In reality, they were siphoning U.S. tech and cash straight into Kim Jong Un’s regime.When HR teams requested video verification, Chapman didn’t blink. She jumped on camera herself, sometimes in costume, pretending to be the person in the résumé. She ran the whole operation like a talent agency for cybercriminals, staging fake job interviews, coaching the operatives on what to say and even laundering their salaries through U.S. banks.Her take? At least $800,000, paid as “service fees.”The total haul for North Korea? Over $17 million in stolen salaries, according to the FBI, which called the scheme a national security threat. Chapman called it “helping her friends.” Really.KIM JONG UN’S YOUNG DAUGHTER BEING GROOMED TO LEAD REGIME AFTER MILITARY PARADE VISIT IN CHINA: EXPERT North Korea netted over $17 million in stolen salaries, courtesy Chapman’s scheme. (Edgar Su/Reuters)Eventually, the scam began to unravel. Investigators noticed odd patterns like dozens and dozens of remote hires all listing the same Arizona address, or company systems being accessed from countries the workers supposedly had never visited.Chapman was arrested and sentenced in July 2025 to 102 months in federal prison.And the wildest part? She did it all from her living room. Talk about working from home! CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPGet tech-smarter on your scheduleAward-winning host Kim Komando is your secret weapon for navigating tech.National radio:  Airing on 500+ stations across the US – Find yours or get the free podcast.Daily newsletter: Join 650,000 people who read the Current (free!)Watch: On Kim’s YouTube channelCopyright 2025, WestStar Multimedia Entertainment. All rights reserved. 

She helped North Korea infiltrate American tech companies Read More »

medical intubation training hospital scaled 1

UC Santa Barbara develops new soft robotic system for emergency intubation procedures

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
When someone stops breathing, the clock starts ticking. First responders often need to get air into the lungs fast, and one of the most reliable ways is to slide a tube into the windpipe. This process, called intubation, keeps the airway open so that oxygen can flow again.Here’s the catch: intubation is incredibly hard. Even trained doctors can struggle, and every extra second puts the patient at greater risk. Now, researchers at UC Santa Barbara have designed a soft robotic device that could change how first responders handle these emergencies. It helps guide the breathing tube into place quickly, safely, and with far less training than traditional methods.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.Why breathing tubes are so tough to placeOur bodies are built to keep food and foreign objects out of the lungs. A small flap called the epiglottis blocks the windpipe during swallowing, and the path into the trachea is narrow and curved. To get around these obstacles, current tools are rigid. Medics have to lift the epiglottis with a metal scope and carefully angle the tube forward. If it slips into the esophagus instead, oxygen goes to the stomach instead of the lungs. “Traditional tools must be stiff so you can push them, and they only turn by pressing on sensitive tissue,” explained Elliot Hawkes, professor of mechanical engineering at UCSB.DANGEROUS HEART CONDITIONS DETECTED IN SECONDS WITH AI STETHOSCOPE Even trained doctors can struggle with intubation. (Universal Images Group/Getty Images)How the soft robot worksThe new system, called the soft robotic intubation system (SRIS), takes a gentler approach. First, a curved guide sits at the back of the throat. Then a soft inflatable tube slowly unrolls from the inside out as it advances. Instead of being forced in, it naturally follows the right path into the windpipe. This reduces friction, lowers the risk of injury and adapts to different body shapes automatically. “This growing paradigm naturally accounts for minor variations in anatomy,” said lead author David Haggerty, a recent UCSB Ph.D. graduate.What the tests showThe results are eye-opening:Experts had a 100% success rate.Paramedics and EMTs reached a 96% success rate with just five minutes of training.Non-experts placed the tube in an average of 21 seconds, less than half the time needed with advanced video laryngoscopes.Why this device could save more livesMillions of emergency intubations happen in the U.S. each year. Many take place in chaotic, low-light or stressful situations where current tools don’t always work. A device that makes the process easier could be a lifesaver for:Paramedics at accident scenesMilitary medics in combat zonesDoctors in hospitals with limited equipmentAI VIDEO TECH FAST-TRACKS HUMANOID ROBOT TRAINING In trials, both experts and non-experts achieved faster and more successful intubations using the new airway management system — advancing emergency response efficiency. (Kurt Knutsson)The UCSB team is now preparing for clinical trials and FDA approval.HOW MICRO-ROBOTS MAY SOON TREAT YOUR SINUS INFECTIONSWhat this means for youIf this device lives up to its early promise, it could mean that more patients survive emergencies where breathing stops. For families, it means a higher chance that first responders can keep loved ones alive until they reach the hospital. For medics, it offers a safer, faster tool when seconds truly matter.Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.Kurt’s key takeawaysBreathing is life, yet securing an airway is one of the toughest jobs in emergency care. This soft robotic system may help turn a high-risk procedure into something more predictable and safe. While more testing is still ahead, the early data shows how robotics could make a lifesaving difference for patients everywhere. Medical staff participate in hands-on training to practice emergency response and resuscitation techniques using a lifelike simulation mannequin. (Universal Images Group/Getty Images)CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPWould you feel more confident knowing first responders in your community had access to this kind of lifesaving robot? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.  

UC Santa Barbara develops new soft robotic system for emergency intubation procedures Read More »

senior man inheritance scams probate

How public probate records fuel inheritance scams

Key Takeaways: 1. Scammers are targeting grieving families through probate records, posing as attorneys or debt collectors to demand fake fees. 2. Inheritance scams exploit vulnerable individuals by using personal information obtained from probate documents. 3. To protect against inheritance traps, verify identities, limit information sharing, use data removal services, and report any suspicious activity.

How public probate records fuel inheritance scams Read More »