Key Takeaways:
- 1. The US has shifted from interdiction to lethal strikes against suspected drug smugglers in the Caribbean, targeting them like terrorists.
- 2. The legality and implications of this new approach are under scrutiny, with concerns raised about the lack of public evidence and legal basis for the strikes.
- 3. The strategy of destroying boats instead of seizing them may provide short-term gains but risk weakening efforts to dismantle transnational drug networks in the long run.
The US has adopted a new strategy of conducting lethal strikes against suspected drug smugglers in the Caribbean, treating them as terrorists. While supporters argue it is necessary to combat overdose deaths, critics question the legality and authority behind this approach. Concerns have been raised about the lack of public evidence of seized narcotics and the potential consequences of destroying boats instead of capturing them for intelligence purposes. The legal and strategic implications of this new model are being closely examined, with calls for transparency and accountability in justifying these actions.
Insight: The shift from interdiction to lethal force marks a significant departure from traditional maritime drug enforcement practices, raising questions about the effectiveness and consequences of this aggressive approach in the ongoing drug war.
This article was curated by memoment.jp from the feed source: SOFREP.
Read the original article here: https://sofrep.com/news/sink-not-seize-america-is-taking-kill-shots-on-narco-boats/
© All rights belong to the original publisher.
